An Atheism that Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought (Cultural Memory in the Present)

By Stefanos Geroulanos

French philosophy replaced dramatically within the moment sector of the 20 th century. within the wake of global conflict I and, later, the Nazi and Soviet failures, significant philosophers resembling Kojève, Levinas, Heidegger, Koyré, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, and Hyppolite argued that guy may now not fill the void left by way of the "death of God" with out additionally calling up the worst in human background and denigrating the respect of the human topic. In reaction, they contributed to a brand new trust that guy may still now not be considered because the foundation for lifestyles, notion, and ethics; particularly, human nature grew to become depending on different ideas and constructions, together with Being, language, inspiration, and tradition. This argument, which used to be to be paramount for existentialism and structuralism, got here to dominate postwar proposal. This highbrow heritage of those advancements argues that at their center lay a brand new atheism that defied humanism as inadequate and finally violent.

Show description

Preview of An Atheism that Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought (Cultural Memory in the Present) PDF

Similar Anthropology books

Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind

Big apple instances Bestseller"I could suggest this booklet to an individual drawn to a enjoyable, enticing examine early human history…you’ll have a difficult time placing it down. "--Bill Gates"Thank God somebody ultimately wrote [this] distinctive booklet. "--Sebastian JungerFrom a popular historian comes a groundbreaking narrative of humanity’s construction and evolution—a number one overseas bestseller—that explores the ways that biology and background have outlined us and better our knowing of what it potential to be “human.

How Traditions Live and Die (Foundations of Human Interaction)

Of everything we do and say, such a lot shouldn't be repeated or reproduced. now and again, besides the fact that, an idea or a convention generates a series of transmission that covers extra distance via house and time than anyone individual ever might. What makes such transmission chains attainable? for 2 centuries, the dominant view (from psychology to anthropology) was once that people owe their cultural prosperity to their powers of imitation.

The Last Imaginary Place: A Human History of the Arctic World

Sea ice and the hour of darkness solar, flaming aurora and never-ending wintry weather night--the arctic of traveler's stories and romantic novels is the unimaginable dream of an enormous and desolate world--the final imaginary position in the world. Now, during this attention-grabbing quantity, well known archeologist Robert McGhee lifts the veil to bare the real Arctic.

Public Health, Ethics, and Equity

This ebook builds an interdisciplinary figuring out of healthiness fairness. With contributions from unusual philosophers, anthropologists, economists, and public-health experts, it centres on 5 significant topics: what's wellbeing and fitness fairness? ; wellbeing and fitness fairness and social justice; tasks for health and wellbeing; moral matters in well-being review; and anthropological views.

Extra info for An Atheism that Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought (Cultural Memory in the Present)

Show sample text content

Is the Nothingness (Nichts) that annihilates given-Being latest as global, and that nihilates itself (as actual historic time or heritage) in and through that annihilation of the given. (ILH 574)33 an identical emphasis maintains during the direction (ILH 198) until eventually Kojève’s concluding lecture, which famously broadcasts the “end of history,” in particular grounding this on a presumed finish to the elemental contrast among guy and given Being. deciding upon guy with Hegelian determinate negation, Kojève writes, “Man is hence Nicht-sein, Not-Being, Nothing,” to be contrasted to Being, static-given-Being. “And this Negativity—that is, this Nothingness nihilating as Time in Space—is what types the very beginning of in particular human existence—that is, really energetic or artistic, or historic, person, and unfastened, life. This Nothingness, too, is what makes guy a passerby within the spatial global: he's born and he dies in it as guy” (ILH 431–32  /  IRH 155). If Kojève heavily believed that Hegel’s Alexandre Kojève’s destructive Anthropology    monistic ontology used to be “a entire if grandiose failure,” this postphenomenological dualism served because the center of his personal attempt, the foundation for any figuring out of man’s glossy situation. 34 Its declare and impression is precise: nature and Being are given; guy is the middle of the Phenomenology of Spirit, and the circulate of the dialectic from anthropogenesis in bankruptcy IVa (“Lordship and Bondage”) via dying in bankruptcy VIII (“Absolute Knowledge”) isn't the heritage of cause or the development of Spirit, however the ascent of guy. it is very important emphasize the variation among Kojève and Hegel in this topic, and the productiveness of Kojève’s reductive method of Hegel. certainly, as philosophers from Jean Hyppolite to Jean-Luc Nancy (to stick with the French context) have proven, the Phenomenology of Spirit doesn't permit for an instantaneous id of guy with Aufhebung (sublation) as Kojève calls for. For Kojève (already in L’Athéisme) interplay with the given allows mostly “homogeneous” modes of being. alterations of subject and substance, of shape, qualitative content material, and mode of Being of the given, or even of other (if complementary) conceptions of the realm (physical, mathematical, and so forth [AT 77]) don't a lot regulate the actual fact of givenness, or the ontological relation of guy to the person beings and items with which he's confronted (AT 105). 35 in contrast, the Thesis in Hegel isn't coded as homogeneous, whereas Hegel’s determinate negation can't be pointed out with guy and includes what Kojève could surely examine transcendental leaps in Seinsmodus, in worldview, within the given. Georges Bataille’s notes from the direction recommend that Kojève allowed this war of words with Hegel— a war of words the most important to the ontological arguments of the two—to develop into obvious all through his lectures: “According to Kojève, negativity simply within the human being—for Kojève: open Dialectical Schema—for Hegel: closed schema. ”36 four. Homogeneity, Ontological and Social An extension of this argument, additional distancing Kojève from Hegel’s inspiration of determinate negation, contains what Kojève calls homogeneity, a strategic concept that limits Man’s negation of the given.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.18 of 5 – based on 20 votes